The Scope of Supervision By The Heritage Over The Use of Assets By Persons Under Guardianship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i2.313Abstract
The Estates Office (BHP) is a colonial legacy institution that continues to exist in the Indonesian legal system, with the authority to manage inherited assets, oversee guardianships, and implement trusts. This study aims to analyze the BHP's authority in overseeing trusts, the role of notaries and PPATs in supporting the legality of legal actions, and Limitations on the use of assets by guardians for the benefit of those under guardianship. The method used is socio-legal research with a legal and conceptual sociology approach, through a case study at the Surabaya Legal Trust Agency (BHP). The results of the study indicate that BHP has a strategic role as a supervisory guardian to ensure that the guardian carries out its obligations in accordance with the law, protects the rights of parties who are legally incompetent, and prevents abuse of authority. However, the effectiveness of supervision is still hampered by limited human resources, undigitized administrative infrastructure, difficulties in cross-agency coordination, and legal gaps regarding sanctions for negligent guardians. Concrete cases demonstrate negligence by guardians that impacts the fulfillment of the needs of the custodial party, demonstrating the weakness of existing technical regulations. This study emphasizes the importance of reformulating regulations regarding guardianship, strengthening the capacity of BHP, accelerating digitalization, and optimizing inter-agency cooperation to increase the effectiveness of supervision. Thus, BHP can function optimally as a state instrument in providing substantive legal protection for vulnerable parties, while realizing the principles of legal certainty, justice, and benefit.
References
Ali, A. (2002). Menguak tabir hukum: Suatu kajian filosofis dan sosiologis.
Amiruddin, A. Z. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Cet. Ke-1.
Beni, A. S. (2008). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Melinda, S., & Djajaputra, G. (2021). Pembuatan Akta Notaris Di Luar Wilayah Jabatannya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(7), 3521–3541.
NURHAYATI, B. R., & PURWANTO, I. H. (2017). Hukum Perdata, Hukum Perorangan dan Keluarga. Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.
Permadi, I. (2023). Electronic title certificate as legal evidence: The land registration system and the quest for legal certainty in Indonesia. Digital Evidence & Elec. Signature L. Rev., 20, 47.
Permadi, I., Kamula, A. A., Sari, B. S. W., & Wiratmanta, A. (2023). HUKUM AGRARIA KONTEMPORER: Relasinya dengan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Pustaka peradaban.
Permadi, I., Maharani, D. P., & Ahmad, M. Y. (2024). LEGAL PERSPECTIVES ON DIGITALISING LAND CERTIFICATES: Analyzing Synchronization and Harmonization in Indonesia’s Job Creation Law. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 15(2), 337–379.
Simbolon, N. Y., & Sh, M. (2022). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 87.
Sulistyarini, R., Widyanti, Y. E., Suwardiyati, R., & Wicaksono, S. (2022). Hukum Perdata: Buku Ajar. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Wijayanti, A. (2009). Hukum ketenagakerjaan pasca reformasi (Vol. 1). Sinar Grafika.
Yani, D. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Harta Warisan Anak Melalui Revitalisasi Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP). Jurnal Notarius, 1(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fairuszia Carista Syukroini Putri, Iwan Permadi, Arini Jauharoh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
