Legal Review of Decisions Exceeding The Demands (Ultra Petita)

Authors

  • Erin Irgo Septyalona Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Bastianto Nugroho Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya,Indonesia
  • Mohammad Roesli Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i4.264

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the provisions for proceedings at the General Court and specifically the provisions for proceedings at the Constitutional Court in carrying out the judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution according to Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court. Method Normative research, with a conceptual approach, namely legal research that looks for principles, doctrines and sources of law in a juridical philosophical sense.Results of the Constitutional Court (MK). The establishment of the Constitutional Court was based on the third amendment to the 1945 Constitution which was carried out by the MPR in 2001. The Constitutional Court is an independent judicial authority to administer justice to uphold law and justice alongside the Supreme Court and subordinate courts (Article 24 paragraphs (1) and (2) Amendment Third). The Constitutional Court was formed to guarantee that the constitution as the highest law can be enforced, so that the Constitutional Court is known as the guardian of the constitution.

References

Ahmad, A., & Nggilu, N. M. (2019). The Pulse of the Fifth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution through the Involvement of the Constitutional Court as the Principle of the Guardian of the Constitution. Constitutional Journal, 16(4), 785–808.

Amada, R. (2023). Legal Philosophy as an Understanding of the Evolution of Justice. Nusantara: Journal of Education, Arts, Sciences and Social Humanities, 1(02).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Post-reform development and consolidation of State Institutions/Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie, SH.

Budiardjo, M. (2003). Basics of political science. Main library Gramedia.

Budiardjo, M., Suseno, N., & Evaquarta, R. (2014). Political Science: Scope and Concepts. Jakarta: Open University.

Kurnia, T. S. (2014). Human Rights Constitution: The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Student Library.

Mahfud, M. (2009). Constitution and law in controversial issues/Prof. Dr, Moh. Mahfud MD.

Mahfud, M. D. (2009). Achievements and projections of Indonesia's legal conditions. Jurnal Hukum Right Because Right, 16(3), 291–310.

Marzuki, L. (2018). Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court. Indonesian Legislation Journal, 1(3), 1–6.

Sasmitom, H. A. (2016). Ultra Petita decision of Constitutional Court on judicial review (the perspective of progressive law). JILS, 1, 47.

Subagyono, B. S. A., Wahyudi, J., & Akbar, R. (2014). Study of the Application of Ultra Petita Principles in Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono. Jurisprudence, 29(1), 100–112.

Sugiyono, H., Suyanto, H., & Suherman, S. (2020). The Implementation of Ultra Petita Decisions In Civil Dispute. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(3), 132–142.

Syarifuddin, A. (2017). Positivism Philosophy and Positive Law School. Legality: A Law Journal, 7(1), 1–22.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal Review of Decisions Exceeding The Demands (Ultra Petita). (2025). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 20(4), 452-468. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i4.264