The Authority of Judicial Orders of the Constitutional Court A Study of Legal Construction and Separation of Powers in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.289Keywords:
Judicial Orders, Constitutional Court, Legal Construction, Separation, PowersAbstract
This study discusses the authority of judicial orders issued by the Constitutional Court in the context of legal construction and the principle of separation of powers in Indonesia. Judicial orders, as a concrete form of the expansion of the role of the judiciary, play an important role in filling legal gaps and ensuring the implementation of the Constitution, especially when the executive and legislative branches fail to fulfill their obligations. This study employs a normative legal approach with three analytical methods: a statutory approach, a case study of Constitutional Court decisions, and a conceptual approach to relevant legal theories. The findings indicate that judicial orders in Indonesia are not supported by a strong implementation framework, unlike practices in other countries such as India, Colombia, South Africa, Austria, and Germany, which are more progressive in regulating and supervising the implementation of judicial orders. The Indonesian Constitutional Court tends to issue declaratory or conditional rulings, but effective follow-up mechanisms do not accompany these. Therefore, this study recommends reformulating rulings to be more operational, establishing an implementation oversight unit, and adopting a continuing mandamus model for strategic issues as part of efforts to strengthen the role of the Constitutional Court in upholding constitutional supremacy and substantive justice in a constitutional democracy.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Universalization of Democratic Constitutionalism and The Work of Constitutional Courts Today. Constitutional Review, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev121
Awawda, O. (2024). Assessment of De Jure Judicial Independence of Constitutional Courts According to International Guidelines. Constitutional Review, 10(1), 202–202. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1017
Barroso, L. R. (2011). “Here, There and Everywhere”: Human Dignity in Contemporary Law and in the Transnational Discourse. SSRN Electronic Journal, 35(2).
Butt, S. (2015). The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. BRILL.
Fiss, O. M. (1979). The Forms of Justice. Harvard Law Review, 93(1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340310
Ginsburg, T. (2006). Judicial review in new democracies : constitutional courts in Asian cases. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Gwyn, W. B., & Vile, M. J. C. (1970). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. The Western Political Quarterly, 23(3), 649. https://doi.org/10.2307/446581
Hirschl, R. (2007). Towards juristocracy the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.
Kishan, M. C. (2024). THE LIMITS OF THE JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2024.v8.i2.p203-224
Liebenberg, S. (2016). Socio-economic rights : adjudication under a transformative constitution. Juta.
Salman, R., Sukardi, S., & Aris, M. S. (2018). JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. Yuridika, 33(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7279
Sathe, S. P. (2002). Judicial Activism in India. Oxford University Press, USA.
Scribner, D. L. (2010). The Judicialization of (Separation of Powers) Politics: Lessons from Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(3), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1000200303
Shakti, A. G., Tyas, M. W., & Lutfi, M. (2023). The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 6(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i3.26940
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Nur, A. I., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(2), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848
Sundariwati, N. L. D. (2024). Judicial Activism: Diantara Melindungi Supremasi Konstitusional Atau Transisi Menuju Juristocracy. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2135
Sweet, A. S. (2000). Governing with Judges. OUP Oxford.
Wicaksono, D. A., & Rahman, F. (2022). Influencing or Intervention? Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 8(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev823
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syafiq Ramdhani, Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara, Riana Susmayanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.