Regulations On Proofing Marriage Announcement As A Requirement For Catholic Divorce In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.319Keywords:
Annulment Letter, Marriage Annulment, Canon Law, Catholic Divorce, Legal CertaintyAbstract
This study examines the urgency of the annulment letter in the Catholic divorce system in Indonesia as a legal instrument that plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between civil law and the canon law of the Catholic Church. The annulment letter serves not only as an administrative document but also as proof of the legality of the annulment of marriage, determining the validity of the marriage sacrament according to Church law. This study found that the lack of clear regulations regarding the recognition and verification of annulment letters in district courts can lead to legal uncertainty and conflict over the dual status between civil and canonical recognition. The annulment process in the Catholic Church itself is a pastoral judicial mechanism that assesses the validity of a marriage based on the norms of faith and canon law, with stages including filing, examining evidence, and a tribunal decision. This study emphasizes the importance of synchronizing the results of the ecclesiastical tribunal process with the national legal system to ensure justice, legal certainty, and the protection of the rights of Catholics. A comparative approach to the legal systems of other countries shows that the integration of the results of religious tribunal decisions into the national legal system can be achieved through transparent and measurable administrative mechanisms. Thus, the regulation of proof and recognition of annulment letters in Indonesian national law is expected to realize harmonization between religious law and state law, while strengthening legal, spiritual, and social protection for Catholic couples.
References
Coriden, J. A. (2004). An introduction to canon law. A&C Black.
Dandi, Y., Dendri, D., & Endi, Y. (2025). The Intersection of Dayak Tarangk Customary Divorce Practices and Canon Law. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 8(1), 1–15.
Flood, M. (2007). Presumption in Canon Law and Its Application to Marriage Legislation. Studia Canonica, 41(2), 401.
Ingram, M. (1990). Church courts, sex and marriage in England, 1570-1640. Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. S., & Katz, R. S. (1975). The new Indonesian marriage law: a mirror of Indonesia’s political, cultural, and legal systems. Am. J. Comp. L., 23, 653.
Mazya, T. M., Ridho, K., & Irfani, A. (2024). Religious and cultural diversity in Indonesia: Dynamics of acceptance and conflict in a multidimensional perspective. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(7), 4932–4945.
Robb, A. M. (2015). The relationship between a theological understanding of marital commitment and a juridical articulation of marital consent in sacramental marriages in the United States. Duquesne University.
Sholehudin, M., Fadli, M., Sulistyarini, R., & Djumikasih, D. (2025). Cancellation of marriage due to apostasy in Islamic law and human rights: A comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syari’ah, 17(1), 33–51.
Sir, N. M. (2024). Voidable marriages. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 26(1), 20–40.
Sumiarni, E. (2024). Historical Study of Marriage Law Between the Norms and the Problematics. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(5), 1–19.
Vasoli, R. H. (1998). What God has joined together: The annulment crisis in American Catholicism. Oxford University Press.
Witte, J. (2012). From sacrament to contract: Marriage, religion, and law in the Western tradition. Presbyterian Publishing Corp.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arda Zamiatun, Rachmi Sulistyarini, Nur Chanifah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







