Notarial Use of Electronic Signatures: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Korea

Klaura Dwi Kinasih; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; Diana R.W. Napitupulu

doi:10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.334

Authors

Klaura Dwi Kinasih Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
Diana R.W. Napitupulu Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.334

Keywords:

Authentic deed; comparative law; electronic signature; legal certainty; notary

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed notarial practices, particularly regarding the use of electronic signatures in the creation of authentic deeds. This study provides a normative legal analysis comparing the regulation of electronic signatures by notaries in Indonesia and South Korea, focusing on legal certainty, document validity, and authenticity. In Indonesia, the regulation is governed by Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Notary Position Act (UUJN), which requires that deeds be signed in the physical presence of a notary. Meanwhile, South Korea comprehensively regulates this matter through the Electronic Signature Act (ESA) and the Notary Act, which authorizes notaries to use certified electronic signatures supported by a government-integrated digital verification system. This research employs a normative juridical approach with comparative legal analysis to examine the alignment and divergence of legal norms between the two countries, as well as their relation to the authenticity principle of deeds as stipulated in Article 1868 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The findings reveal that South Korea has fully implemented electronic signatures in notarial practice through robust legal and technological infrastructure, whereas Indonesia still faces normative conflicts among the ITE Law, the Notary Position Act, and the Civil Code. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is necessary to ensure that Indonesia's notarial system can transition toward digitalization while preserving authenticity and legal certainty.

References

Anshori, Iqbal, Elita Rahmi, and Syamsir Syamsir. “The Polemic of the Application of Electronic Signatures in the Creation of Authentic Deeds.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 353–73.

Central Government of Indonesia. “Law (UU) Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions,” 2024. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Central Government of Indonesia. “Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 Concerning the Position of Notary,” 2014. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Dewi, Devi Chintya, Dinda Amelia, Faizal Rakha Ratama, Faturachman Shidiq, Firgy Ferdansyah, and Dikha Anugrah. “Electronic Signatures as a Solution to Contract Law in the Digital Era in Indonesia.” Journal of Civil Law 1, no. 2 (2024): 1–13. https://journal.fhukum.uniku.ac.id/letterlijk/article/view/66%0Ahttps://journal.fhukum.uniku.ac.id/letterlijk/article/download/66/65. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.

Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA). “Public Key Infrastructure in Korea: Overview and Operation,” 2020. (Republic of Korea, 2009; Electronic Signature Act, 2001)

Korea Notaries Association. “KNA Presentation,” 2014. http://www.koreanotary.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/KNA-presentation.pdf?PHPSESSID=31801633879958cf5fbd8c1588ef5ff5. (Republic of Korea, 2009; Electronic Signature Act, 2001)

Mayana, Ranti Fauza, and Tisni Santika. “Legality of Electronic Signatures: Possibilities and Challenges of Notary Digitalization in Indonesia.” ACTA DIURNAL Journal of Notary Law 4, no. 2 (2021): 244–62. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Ministry of Communication and Informatics of Indonesia. “Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 11 of 2018 Concerning the Implementation of Electronic Certification,” 2018. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Ministry of Justice Korea. “E-Notarization System Implementation Report,” 2011.

Ministry of Justice of South Korea. “Ministry of Justice Electronic Notary System,” 2015. https://enotary.moj.go.kr/. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Progressive Law: A Synthesis of Indonesian Law. Genta Pub., 2009. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Republic of Korea. “Electronic Signature Act,” 2001.

Republic of Korea. “Notary Public Act (Amended by Act No. 9416),” 2009.

Sanusi, Arsyad. Cyber Law: Personal Data Protection and Electronic Signatures in Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Setiawati, Sicilia Firdaus, Tetti Samosir, and Fitrai Deni. “The Legal Politics of Cyber Notaries in the Era of Digitalization 5.0 in Indonesia.” Notarius 18, no. 3 (2025): 905–24. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Normative Legal Research: A Brief Review. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.

South Korea. “Notary Public Act, No. 9416, February 6, 2009, Article 66-7,” 2009. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Supreme Court. “Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 Concerning Mediation Procedures in Court,” 2016. (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)

Zulfikar, Zulfikar, and Indri Meiliawati. “Legal Challenges and Regulatory Harmonization of the Status of Notarial Deeds in Electronic Agreement Evidence in Indonesia's Digital Era.” Lex Lectio Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–13a (Law No. 11 of 2008; Law No. 2 of 2014)