Conceptualization of Crypto Asset As A Collateral Object In Indonesian Positive Law

Authors

  • Firda Shafira Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Stephanie Wilamarta Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.335

Keywords:

Crypto Assets, Collateral Objects, Fiduciary, Legal Certainty

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to crypto assets as a new form of digital wealth with economic value and can be legally traded in Indonesia, based on Bappebti regulations. However, their legal status as fiduciary collateral remains controversial because Indonesian property law does not fully accommodate intangible assets such as crypto assets. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of crypto assets as fiduciary collateral from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, using normative juridical research methods through legislative and conceptual approaches. The results show that functionally, crypto assets fulfill the characteristics of objects in collateral law, as they have economic value, can be legally transferred, and can be used as a basis for debt repayment. However, the lack of a mechanism for registration, assessment, and execution of digital collateral creates legal uncertainty in financing practices. Comparisons with other countries such as Switzerland, the United States, and Singapore indicate that the successful recognition of crypto assets as collateral depends heavily on a clear legal framework governing ownership protection and oversight mechanisms. In the Indonesian context, Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (P2SK) provides an opportunity for reform by expanding the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in regulating digital financial assets. Therefore, harmonization of the Civil Code, the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the P2SK Law, and Bappebti regulations is necessary to ensure that crypto assets can be legally and effectively accommodated as collateral. With appropriate regulations, national law will be able to adapt to digital innovation without sacrificing the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency.

References

Arikunto, S. (2011). Research procedures: A practical approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Glenn, H. P. (2014). Legal traditions of the world (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harahap, Y. (2012). Aspects of contract law. Bandung: Alumni.

Harsono, B. (2008). Indonesian agrarian law: History of the formation of the basic agrarian law, its content and implementation. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Ibrahim, J. (2007). Theory and methodology of normative legal research (3rd ed.). Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2002). Legal concepts in development. Bandung: Alumni.

Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Legal research. Jakarta: Kencana.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2004). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Posner, R. (1990). The problem of jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rahardjo, S. (2014). Legal science (8th ed.). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Salim, H. S. (2014). Development of guarantee law in Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sidharta, B. A. (2009). Reflections on the structure of legal science. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Normative legal research: A brief review. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Subekti, R. (2005). Principles of civil law. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2008). Land in the perspective of economic, social, and cultural rights. Jakarta: Kompas.

Sunarto. (1990). Descriptive research methods. Surabaya: National Business.

Wahbah az-Zuḥaylī. (1989). Al-fiqh al-Islāmī wa adillatuhu (Vol. IV). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.

(Moleong, 2004)

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

Conceptualization of Crypto Asset As A Collateral Object In Indonesian Positive Law. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 21(4), 556-570. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.335