Legal Analysis of Amendments To Marital Property Separation Agreements In Civil Law Perspective

Authors

  • Calysta Dwiayu Wisnu Putri Universitas Brawijaya
  • Djumikasih Universitas Brawijaya
  • Stephanie Wilamarta Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.349

Keywords:

Keywords:Marital Property Separation Agreement; Amendment Of Marital Agreement; Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015; Civil Law; Legal Certainty.

Abstract

Marital property separation agreements are governed by Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Articles 139–148 of the Indonesian Civil Code, which originally restricted their execution to the period prior to marriage. The issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, however, permits postnuptial amendments with court approval, thereby generating legal uncertainty regarding the legal status of marital assets and inconsistencies in judicial decisions. This study aims to examine the legal status of joint property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement following the Constitutional Court’s decision and to analyze the legal implications of amendments or annulments of marital agreements on the position and distribution of marital property. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, conducted through library research of primary legal materials, including marriage legislation, the Civil Code, and relevant court decisions, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical approach. The results indicate that marital property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement is subject to prospective application and does not have retroactive effect, thereby maintaining its original legal status in accordance with the principle of legal certainty. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of implementing regulations to ensure uniformity in notarial and judicial practices and to promote distributive and corrective justice.

References

Ali, A. (2002). Menguak tabir hukum: Suatu kajian filosofis dan sosiologis. Jakarta: Toko Gunung Agung.

Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marbun, Y. R. D., & Silaen, A. P. (2024). Analisis yuridis legalitas perjanjian perkawinan pisah harta sebagai perlindungan hukum bagi suami dan istri dalam proses perceraian. Hukum Dinamika Ekselensia, 6(4), 721.

Musliansyah, I. (2023). Analisis yuridis perubahan perjanjian kawin menurut hukum positif Indonesia pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 7(1), 88.

Otto, J. M. (2009). Rechtsstaat and rule of law: Between modernity and tradition. The Hague: Leiden University Press.

Putri, E. R., et al. (2022). Kedudukan perjanjian perkawinan dalam praktik notaris pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 34.

Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soper, P. (1977). Legal theory and the obligation of a judge: The Hart/Dworkin dispute. Michigan Law Review, 75(3), 475.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Legal Analysis of Amendments To Marital Property Separation Agreements In Civil Law Perspective. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 22(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.349