Inconsistency in Constitutional Interpretation in The Judicial Review of The Anti-Corruption Law in Indonesia

Authors

  • Oktoriusman Halawa Faculty of Law, Kristen University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tomson Situmeang Faculty of Law, Kristen University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.389

Keywords:

Constitutional Interpretation, Judicial Review, Anti-Corruption Law, Limitation Of Power, Rule Of Law

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of constitutional interpretation in the judicial review of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law, as well as to examine the obstacles and solutions in limiting state power in Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Legal materials are collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation methods. The results show that the dynamics of constitutional interpretation in Case Number 142/PUU-XXII/2024 reflect a tension between a formalistic approach emphasizing legal certainty and a substantive approach oriented toward the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts. The petition primarily concerns the application of norms rather than their constitutionality. Furthermore, the limitation of state power in Indonesia faces several challenges, including unclear institutional authority, inconsistent constitutional interpretation, political influence in law-making, and weak legal culture and integrity. From the perspectives of Gustav Radbruch and Carl J. Friedrich, a balance between legal certainty, justice, and utility, as well as the strengthening of constitutional mechanisms, is essential to ensure effective limitation of state power within a rule of law framework.

References

Ali, M. (2010). The Constitutional Court and Progressive Legal Interpretation. Jurnal Konstitusi, 85–86.

Ardiansyah, I. (2018). The Constitutional Court's Interpretation of Criminal Conspiracy by Corruptors (Study of Decision Number 21/PUU-XIV/2016). Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 230.

Arief, M. d. (2005). Criminal Theories and Policy. Bandung: Alumni.

Aris, I. (2018). The Position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the Constitutional System from the Perspective of the Theory of The New Separation of Power. Jurnal Jurisprudentie, 109.

Darmadi, N. S. (2011). The Position and Authority of the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian Constitutional Legal System. Jurnal Hukum, 670.

Efendi, D. O. (2022). A Conceptual Approach in Normative Legal Research as a Scientific Method. Journal of Law and Justice, 187, 191.

Fadjar, A. M. (2006). Constitutional Law and the Constitutional Court. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Hamzah, A. (2001). Anthology of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hari Purwadi, A. G. (2010). Restitution of Regional Financial Losses Due to Corruption. Yustisia Journal, 27.

Hartanti, E. (2005). Corruption Crimes. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Legislature, M. D. (2007). Constitutional Court: Towards Positive Legislature? Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Mahrus Ali, D. S. (2020). Corruption Offenses. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mamudji, S. S. (2021). Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal Philosophy. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Legal Science. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Riyan Auliyanda Safrizal, F. M. (2025). Changes in the Nature of Offenses in Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, 191.

Sidharta, B. A. (2000). Reflections on the Structure of Legal Science: A Study of the Foundations and Scientific Nature of Legal Science as a Foundation for the Development of Indonesian National Legal Science. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Restorative Justice in the Criminalization of Corrupt Corporations to Optimize Restitution of State Losses. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 431–432.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Inconsistency in Constitutional Interpretation in The Judicial Review of The Anti-Corruption Law in Indonesia. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 22(3), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.389