The Principle of Legal Balance and the Degradation of Incentive Rights in Protected Rice Field Policies

Authors

  • Mohammad Habib Ramdhani Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Iwan Permadi Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Indah Dwi Qurbani Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.399

Keywords:

Protected Paddy Fields (LSD), incentives, legal certainty, principle of balance, principle of proportionality.

Abstract

The increasing conversion of paddy fields to non-agricultural uses poses a significant threat to national food security, prompting the Indonesian Government to enact Presidential Regulation Number 4 of 2026 concerning the Control of Paddy Field Conversion. This regulation introduces a protection mechanism through the designation of Protected Paddy Fields (LSD) and imposes restrictions on landowners' rights to convert their agricultural land. As a balancing instrument, the regulation also provides incentives for individuals who maintain the agricultural function of their land. However, the incentive provisions contained in Articles 20 and 21 raise normative concerns, particularly due to the phrase "subject to the State's financial capacity," which creates legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the ambiguity of the incentive provisions on the legal certainty of Protected Paddy Field owners and to assess their conformity with the principles of balance and proportionality in administrative law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The findings reveal that the phrase constitutes a vague norm because it fails to specify the parameters of the State's fiscal capacity, the mechanism for granting incentives, or the legal consequences of the State's failure to provide them. As a result, the public's right to receive incentives becomes uncertain, while the restrictions on land conversion rights apply directly and are legally binding. This situation creates an asymmetric legal relationship between the State and landowners, indicating that the incentive provisions under Presidential Regulation Number 4 of 2026 do not fully satisfy the principles of legal certainty, balance, and proportionality. Therefore, a normative reconstruction is necessary to ensure the certainty of incentive implementation as a form of legal protection for landowners affected by controlling policies the conversion of paddy fields.

References

Legislation

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1960 Number 104, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2043.

Law Number 41 of 2009 concerning Protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2009 Number 149, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5068.

Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2014 Number 292, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5601.

Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1999 Number 165, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3886.

Presidential Regulation Number 4 of 2026 concerning Control of Conversion of Paddy Fields, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2026 Number 11.

Presidential Regulation Number 59 of 2019 concerning Control of Conversion of Paddy Fields, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2019 Number 163.

Book

Achmad Ali. (2009). Uncovering Legal Theory and Judicial Prudence, Including Legislative Interpretation. Jakarta: Kencana.

Budiono, H. (2006). The Principle of Balance for Indonesian Contract Law: Contract Law Based on the Principles of Indonesian Wigati. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harsono, B. (1999). Indonesian Agrarian Law: History of the Formation of the Basic Agrarian Law, Its Contents and Implementation. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Lotulung, PE (1994). General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sumardjono, MSW (2015). Dynamics of Land Acquisition Regulation in Indonesia: From Presidential Decree to Law. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Journal

Hidayat, A., & Arifin, Z. (2019). Legislative legal politics as socio-equilibrium in Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 147–159.https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654

Janti, GI, Martono, E., & Subejo. (2016). Protecting sustainable food crop land to strengthen regional food security (Study in Bantul Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta). Journal of National Resilience, 22(1), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.16666

Laila, F., Budiono, AR, Permadi, I., & Istislam. (2020). The Implementation of Good Faith Principles in the Transfer and Registration of Land Rights Based on Basic Agrarian Law. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Special Edition: Safe Communities

Qurbani, ID, & Rafiqi, ID (2022). Natural Resources Sector Business and Human Rights in Indonesia: Realities and Challenges. Media Iuris, 5(2)

Qurbani, ID, Satriawan, I., & Fathi, M. (2025). Human Rights and Environmental Protection: Case Studies from Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 660(02012)

Rustandi, RM, Febrianty, Y., & Hosnah, AU (2025). Legal certainty regarding compensation in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Yustisi, 12(3), 231–255.https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v12i3.21561

Samun Ismaya. (2025). Theoretical study of dualism of interests and social functions of land rights. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 4(2), 243–270.https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v4i2.318

Setiawan, SA, Permadi, I., & Harini, NDP (2025). Impact of protected rice fields policy on non-agricultural land. Law. Human. Environment, 16(2).

Sihombing, EN, Andryan, A., & Astuti, M. (2021). Analysis of incentive policies for the protection of sustainable food cropland in Indonesia. Jatiswara, 36(1), 1–10.https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v36i1.278

Susanto, MBU (2021). Application of general principles of good governance in judicial practice in Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 4(3).

Wantu, FM (2012). Realizing legal certainty, justice, and benefit in judges' decisions in civil courts. Journal of Legal Dynamics, 12(3), 479–489.http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121

Wardana, AA, Koeswahyono, I., Permadi, I., & Prasetyo, ND (2025). Reconceptualization of Land Acquisition Regulations for Tourism Village Development Based on the Principle of Public Interest. IUS Journal of Law and Justice Studies, 13(2)

Yasin, IF (2018). The existence of AAUPB in Indonesia and its jurisprudence in state administrative cases. Al-Daulah: Journal of Islamic Law and Legislation, 8(2).https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2018.8.2.296-317

Court ruling

Kisaran District Court. (2022). Decision Number 95/Pdt.G/2021/PN Kis concerning Unlawful Acts in Land Acquisition for Public Interest. Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.

Government Documents

Central Statistics Agency. (2023). Harvested Area and Rice Production in Indonesia 2022 (Fixed Figures). Official Statistics News No. 21/03/Th. XXVI.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

The Principle of Legal Balance and the Degradation of Incentive Rights in Protected Rice Field Policies. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 22(3), 614-628. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.399