The Formulation of Vacant Residential Tax Regulation in Indonesia Based on the Principle of the Social Function of Land Rights

Authors

  • Tajuddin Nur‘Afas Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Tunggul Anshari Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • M. Hamidi Masykur Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.401

Keywords:

Vacant Home Tax; Social Function of Land Rights; Regional Taxation; Housing; Property Speculation.

Abstract

This study analyzes the urgency of regulating the Empty Residential Property Tax in Indonesia’s legal system based on the principle of the social function of land rights and formulates a regulatory model that can be integrated into the local tax regime. A normative juridical method is employed, using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and systematic approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively to examine the relationship between the social function of land rights, the regulatory function of taxation, and housing policy objectives. This study identifies a substantive and structural research gap. Previous studies predominantly focus on (i) the general doctrine of the social function of land rights within agrarian law, (ii) the effectiveness of Land and Building Tax in rural and urban areas (PBB-P2) as a fiscal instrument, or (iii) administrative enforcement of abandoned land regimes. However, limited attention has been given to the construction of a tax mechanism based on the actual utilization status of residential property and its normative grounding in the social function principle of land rights, particularly within Indonesia’s decentralized taxation framework. The findings indicate a normative vacuum in Indonesian positive law, where existing abandoned land mechanisms are insufficient to address intentionally vacant residential properties, while Land and Building Tax in rural and urban areas (PBB-P2) remains property-value oriented without considering occupancy status. This condition creates regulatory inefficiency, market distortion, and contributes to artificial housing scarcity, contradicting the social function principle of land rights. The novelty of this study lies in the formulation of an Empty Residential Property Tax as a progressive add-on mechanism to Land and Building Tax in rural and urban areas (PBB-P2) within the framework of the Law on Financial Relations between Central and Regional Governments. The proposed model introduces a clear vacancy threshold (more than six months per tax year), utility-based data integration as an objective verification tool, proportionate exemptions, and earmarking of revenues for affordable housing programs. This represents a shift from ownership-based taxation to utilization-based taxation in Indonesia’s property tax design.

References

Dinata, I. P. H. B., Tandioga, F. A. S., Cendekiawan, M., & Suci, S. N. (2024). Vacant House Tax: A Solution to High House Prices. IPSAR (International Public Sector Accounting Review), 2(1), 1–13.

Harsono, B. (2021). Indonesian Agrarian Law: History of the Formation of the UUPA, Its Content, and Implementation (Revised Edition). Trisakti University.

Nasrul, R. W. (2025). A Vacant Residential Tax Design as a Solution for Housing Problems in Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 9(2), 61–77.

Indonesia. (1960). Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1960 Number 104.

Indonesia. (1994). Law Number 12 of 1994 concerning Land and Building Tax. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesia. (2000). Law Number 20 of 2000 concerning Amendments to Law Number 21 of 1997 concerning Land and Building Acquisition Tax.

Indonesia. (2009). Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levies. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesia. (2021). Law Number 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation Number 20 of 2021 concerning Regulation of Abandoned Areas and Land. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesia. (2022). Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia

Nasrul, R. W. (2025). A vacant residential tax design as a solution for housing problems in Indonesia. Indonesian Tax Review, 9(2), 61–77.

Nuringsih, D., Setiawan, I., & Kurniawati, L. (2025). Legal reconstruction of property taxation for idle residential assets in Indonesia: A socio-legal perspective. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 11(2), 89–110.

OECD. (2023). Brick by brick: Building better housing policies. OECD Publishing.

Rahmawati, A., Rachmadhika, H. A., Raainaa, N. A., & Saud, Y. V. (2024). Towards an effective vacant property tax (VPT) scheme: A comparative study and its implications in Indonesia. Jurnalku, 4(3), 241–259.

Rejekiningsih, T. (2020). The social function of land rights in realizing agrarian justice in Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 9(2), 237–252.

Sudin, M., Pratama, R. E., & Hidayat, T. (2024). Fiscal instruments and urban housing imbalance: Evaluating the effectiveness of vacancy taxation in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), 201–220.

Segú, M. (2020). The impact of taxing vacancies on housing markets: Evidence from France. Journal of Urban Economics, 115, 103167.

Usman, N. (2022). Indonesian agrarian law. Sinar Grafika.

Wibowo, A., & Nawirah, S. (2026). Vacant property taxation and housing market stabilization: A regulatory approach in emerging economies. Journal of Housing Policy and Comparative Law, 14(1), 33–52.

World Bank. (2024). Property taxation and housing affordability: International experiences and policy lessons. World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

The Formulation of Vacant Residential Tax Regulation in Indonesia Based on the Principle of the Social Function of Land Rights. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 22(4), 644-657. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.401