The Legal Implications of the Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification for the Position of Notaries as Public Officials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.402Keywords:
Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification; Notary; Public Official; Legal Certainty; Risk-Based Business Licensing.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal position of a Notary as a public official following the classification of notarial activities under the Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification Number 69104, as well as to examine the legal certainty of such regulation within the Indonesian legal system. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research gap in this study lies not only in the absence of scholarly analysis linking the Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification as a risk-based business licensing instrument with the position of Notaries as public officials, but also in the lack of examination specifically addressing the normative implications of categorizing public office activities within a business-law regime. Previous studies have generally focused either on the position of Notaries from the perspective of the Notary Law, or on Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification within the context of business licensing administration in general, without situating both within a unified framework of normative conflict and legal system harmonization. The findings indicate that the classification of notarial activities under Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification Number 69104 has the potential to create normative disharmony, as it places the activities of a Notary within a business-oriented economic framework, whereas a Notary’s authority derives from state attribution to perform public service functions. This condition reflects a conceptual shift from a public office to an administrative entity governed by business licensing mechanisms, which is not fully aligned with the legal construction of the Notary position under the Notary Law. The novelty of this research lies in three main aspects. First, it explicitly constructs the normative conflict between the risk-based business licensing regime (Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification 69104) and the legal regime governing Notaries as public officials. Second, it employs a synthesis of the theory of authority and the theory of legal certainty as analytical instruments to assess the validity of such regulation within the Indonesian administrative legal system. Third, it offers a normative harmonization perspective that positions Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification not merely as an administrative instrument, but as a variable capable of shifting the juridical character of the Notary office within Indonesia’s constitutional and administrative legal framework .
References
Adjie, H., & Sjaifurrachman. (2011). Aspects of Notarial Liability in the Preparation of Notarial Deeds. Mandar Maju.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Regulation of Statistics Indonesia No. 7 of 2025 concerning the Indonesia Standard Industrial Classification (KBLI)
Borman, M. S. (2019). The Position of Notaries as Public Officials from the Perspective of the Notary Office Law. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan.
Council of the Notariats of the European Union. (2024). The notarial profession in Europe: Facts and figures 2024. CNUE.
Craig, P. (2023). Administrative law (10th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2024). Public law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. (2024). European Judicial Systems: CEPEJ Evaluation Report 2024: General Analyses. Council of Europe.
Fadli, M., & Hadi, S. (2023). Legal Certainty: A Theoretical Perspective. Nuswantara Media Utama.
Fakrulloh, Z. A., & Wismulyani, E. (2018). Towards an Orderly Population Administration Society. Cempaka Putih.
Hilmi, M. F., Nirmala, M. S., Irawan, R. N., & Saputra, R. R. (2023). The Position of Indonesia Standard Industrial Classification (KBLI) 69104 with Respect to Other Parties as Business Actors in Notarial Activities. Notaire, 6(3), 377–396.
International Union of Notaries. (2023). Fundamental Principles of the Latin Notariat. International Union of Notaries (UINL).
Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Indonesian Civil Procedure Law (Revised ed.). Liberty.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Regulatory policy outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.
Ridwan HR. (2018). State Administrative Law (Revised ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Amendment to Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary.
Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Government Regulation No. 28 of 2025 concerning the Implementation of Risk-Based Business Licensing.
Supriyanto, A., & Sulistyono, A. (2024). Analysis of the Principle of Notary Independence in Notarial Deed Making in Review of the Notary Position Law and the Notary Professional Code of Ethics. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 5(3), 536–540.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2012). On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Ulfa, M., & Wisnaeni, F. (2025). The Role of Notaries in Fiduciary Transactions to Ensure Legal Certainty and Legal Protection. Notarius, 18(2), 357–373.
World Bank. (2023). Business ready 2023: Manual and guide. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arabella Kezia Putri Maulina, Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi, Dewi Iryani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







