The Legitimacy of Criminalizing Insults Against The President And Vice President: A Minimalist Criminal Law Analysis of Articles 218–220 of Indonesia’s Law No. 1 of 2023

Ahda Daffa’ Alian Tarif; Milda Istiqomah

doi:10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.418

Authors

Ahda Daffa’ Alian Tarif Faculty of Law, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Milda Istiqomah Faculty of Law, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.418

Keywords:

Legitimacy Of Criminalization, Insults Against the President, Minimalist Criminal Law, Douglas Husak, Complaint Offense.

Abstract

This study evaluates the legitimacy of criminalizing insults against the President and Vice President under Articles 218–220 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code through Douglas Husak’s theory of minimalist criminal law. The reintroduction of these offenses raises concerns about overcriminalization and restrictions on freedom of expression, particularly in light of Constitutional Court Decision No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006, which invalidated the corresponding provisions of the former Criminal Code. This normative legal study uses statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches to examine the boundaries of punishable conduct, the complaint mechanism under Article 220, and possible reforms. The analysis combines grammatical, systematic, historical, teleological, and comparative interpretation. It argues that the phrase “attacking the honor or dignity” requires a restrictive interpretation that distinguishes personal reputational harm from criticism of public policy or official conduct. It also finds that the complaint mechanism is a procedural safeguard but does not, by itself, establish that a separate criminal offense is necessary, effective, or proportionate. Comparisons with the Netherlands and the United States illustrate alternative approaches to protecting reputation and public debate, although foreign standards cannot be transferred mechanically into Indonesian criminal law. The study proposes a staged reform agenda: prosecutorial guidance in the short term, statutory clarification and proportionality review in the medium term, and consideration of integration into generally applicable defamation provisions in the long term. It concludes that the legitimacy of Articles 218–220 requires stronger justification, clearer statutory boundaries, and safeguards for constitutionally protected expression.

References

Ali, Z. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Anwar, A. S. (2023). Menyoal Pasal Penghinaan KUHP : Antara Proporsionalitas Prinsip Primus Interpares dan Kemunduran Demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wicarana, Volume 2 Nomor 1, 22-24.

Anwar, H. A. (1994). Hukum Pidana Bagian Khsus: KUHP Bagian II, Jilid I. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B. N. (2021). Ilmu Hukum Pidana Integralistik. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2008). Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 532.

Baker, J. D. (2008). Constitutionalizing The Harm Principle. Criminal Justice Ethics Volume 27 Nomor 2, 6.

Hariyanto. (2017). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Yogyakarta: Mahameru Press.

Hiariej, E. O. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Husak, D. (2020). Criminal Law at the Margins. Criminal Law and Philosophy 14, 382.

Indra, M. (2011). Dinamika Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama .

Madiistriyatno, H. (2019). Pemimpin dan Memimpin. Yogyakarta: Bintang Pustaka Madani.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, . Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muntoha. (2009). Demokrasi dan Negara Hukum. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, , 379.

Nurul, Q. d. (2018). Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Demokrasi (Human Right In Democratische Rechtsstaat). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Packer, L. H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. California: Standord University Press.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2002). Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Refika.

Rahmani, P. D. (2025). Implikasi Yuridis Kekaburan Norma Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden. Klausula: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Administrasi, Pidana dan Perdata, Vol. 4 No. 1, 14–20.

Ramdan, A. (2020). Kontroversi Delik Penghinaan Presiden/ Wakil Presiden Dalam RKUHP. Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 13 Nomor 2, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 248.

Ruslan, R. (2016). Hukum Pidana Khusus Memahami Delik Delik di Luar KUHP. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Saputro, A. d. (2023). Menyoal Pasal Penghinaan Presiden Dalam KUHP: Antara Proporsionalitas Prinsip Primus Interpares atau Kemunduran Demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wicarana Vol.2 Nomor 1, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 15.

Wardani, I. E. (2021). Kriminalisasi Penghinaan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam RKUHP Ditinjau dari Hukum Islam dan Konstitusi Indonesia. Jurnal UIN Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, 4.

Yunita, D. d. (2022). Keterkaitan Paham Demokrasi Terhadap Sistem Hukum Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Unes Law Review Vol.5 Nomor 2, Universitas Andalas, Padang, 498.