Complete Systematic Land Registration as Equitable Legal Protection for Uncertified Yasan Land Ownership: A Study in Talangsuko Village, Malang

Authors

  • Ahmad Fikrulloh Amin Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Rachmi Sulistyarini Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Siti Rohmah Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.421

Keywords:

Keywords: Complete Systematic Land Registration; Yasan Land; Legal Protection; Just Law Enforcement; Maslahah.

Abstract

Complete Systematic Land Registration (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, PTSL) aims to provide legal certainty and protection for community land rights. However, previous studies have tended to focus on program effectiveness without specifically examining the quality of the implementation process for holders of uncertified tanah yasan (customary land held under local customary practices). This study offers an original contribution by integrating Soerjono Soekanto’s law enforcement theory, Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, and Imam Al-Ghazali’s maslahah theory to analyze equitable legal protection. It aims to examine the dominant factors hindering PTSL implementation, the measures taken to address these obstacles, and the enforcement of law in a manner that ensures justice for holders of uncertified tanah yasan in Talangsuko Village, Turen Subdistrict, Malang Regency. This study employed a socio-legal research method with a sociological juridical approach. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to 82 respondents selected using purposive sampling based on the relevance of their experience as PTSL participants, interviews, observations, and a review of relevant legislation and legal materials. The findings indicate that the dominant obstacles to PTSL implementation are internal factors, particularly financial management, community participation, and the proper maintenance of administrative documentation. All respondents perceived the preparatory fees charged to them as inconsistent with the applicable provisions as they understood them, while 98.8% stated that they had not been involved in deliberations to determine the fees. These findings indicate problems concerning financial transparency and community participation; however, they do not, in themselves, establish that the fees were legally non-compliant without independent verification of payment records and the legal basis for determining the fees. Recommended improvements include greater financial transparency, administrative assistance, documentation of boundary-marker installation, stronger supervision and coordination, and increased community participation. From the perspective of maslahah, equitable law enforcement must protect property interests through an orderly, transparent, and accountable land registration process. This study is limited to 82 respondents in a single village; therefore, its findings should be interpreted within the research context and cannot be directly generalized to other regions.

References

Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (1997). Al-Mustashfa min ‘ilm al-usul (M. Sulaiman, Ed.). Mu’assasat al-Risalah.

Fahlevi, A. R., Jumanudin, & Safa, M. S. (2026). Implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program in ensuring legal certainty of land ownership rights. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1), 6319–6326.

Fikri, R. H., Sutikno, A. Y. W., & Azis, M. (2023). Legal protection and guarantees of legal certainty for uncertified documentary evidence of land ownership: A case study of land ownership in Sorong Regency. JIH: Equality Before the Law, 2(1).

Friedman, L. M. (2011). The legal system: A social science perspective (M. Khozim, Trans.). Nusa Media.

Hasanah, I., Labibah, I., Putri, S., Ekawahyuni, N. A., & Fikri, M. A. H. (2025). From regulation to reality: Barriers to the implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 3(1), 1–12.

Hamidah, R. I., Santoso, R. S., & Suwitri, S. (2024). An evaluation of the implementation of the community participation-based Complete Systematic Land Registration policy (PTSL+PM) in 2022 and 2023 in Geneng Village, Batealit Subdistrict, Jepara Regency. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 13(3), 148–172.

Huanda, B. C. (2025). A juridical review of the conversion of former customary ownership land under national law: Legal certainty and its challenges. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, 7(1).

Indrayati, R. (2021). The effect of the accelerated Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program on legal certainty of land rights in Brebes Regency [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung].

Lubis, M. Y., & Lubis, A. R. (2008). Land registration law. Mandar Maju.

Maharani, D. P., & Jamilah, L. (2025). Implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program in Soreang Village to increase community income in relation to Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 5(2).

Parlindungan, A. P. (1999). Land registration in Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Pratama, H., Sunarya, A., & Pramono, S. (2023). Accountability and transparency in the Complete Systematic Land Registration program in Sukodono Subdistrict, Sidoarjo Regency. Soetomo Administrasi Publik, special issue, 513–524.

Ratna, L., & Santoso, A. S. (2021). Legal protection of community land ownership rights in the implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). Jurnal Jendela Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1).

Santoso, U. (2012). Agrarian law: A comprehensive study. Prenadamedia Group.

Septiliana, N., et al. (2026). An analysis of community participation in the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program in Batu Bara Regency. Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan (JAPK), 6(1).

Sholikhudin, M. (2021). The effectiveness of the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program: A study in Kalipuro Village, Pungging Subdistrict, Mojokerto Regency [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Malang].

Soekanto, S. (2019). Factors influencing law enforcement. Rajawali Pers.

Srinadi, N. G. A. M., et al. (2024). An analysis of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) policy from the perspectives of legal certainty, justice, and utility: Challenges and opportunities. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(3).

Suharto, B., & Supadno. (2023). Obstacles to the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 9(1).

Susilaningsih, T. (2019). Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) as an embodiment of the government’s obligation to ensure legal certainty and protection of land ownership. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1).

Sutarto, A. H. (2025). From land tenure security to the reproduction of inequality: Reassessing the conditions of Indonesia’s Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program through the lens of structural poverty. Sodalitas: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 13(2).

Tustasari, R. D., & Mustaklima. (2024). An analysis of the impact of limited community involvement in land registration through the perspective of Sunaryati Hartono’s legal culture typology. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 10(1).

Ulupalu, R. (2025). Legal protection for land rights holders under the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program from the perspective of legal certainty. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 9(5).

Downloads

Published

2026-11-03

How to Cite

Complete Systematic Land Registration as Equitable Legal Protection for Uncertified Yasan Land Ownership: A Study in Talangsuko Village, Malang. (2026). YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 22(4), 880-895. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.421