Reformulating The Meaning of “May Result In Loss” In The Criminal Offense of Forgery: Toward Legal Certainty In Indonesian Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.423Keywords:
Document Forgery, Potential Harm, Legal Certainty, Endangerment Offense, Normative Reformulation.Abstract
Modern criminal law increasingly employs preventive mechanisms to protect legally recognized interests before harm actually occurs. This approach is reflected in the offense of document forgery, for which Indonesian criminal law uses the phrase “may result in loss.” Although this formulation allows criminal liability to be considered without proof of completed loss, it raises questions about the threshold at which a risk becomes legally relevant. The absence of express criteria may create uncertainty concerning the nature of the offense, the assessment of evidence, and the scope of criminalization. This study examines the normative construction of the phrase “may result in loss,” identifies the legal boundaries between actual and potential loss, and proposes a formulation intended to strengthen legal certainty. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches, with a limited case-law analysis. Legal materials are examined through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The study finds that potential loss may satisfy the statutory element even where actual loss has not materialized, but a merely abstract or speculative possibility should not suffice. The phrase should be interpreted by reference to (1) an identifiable legally protected interest, (2) a sufficiently direct and relevant connection between the use of the forged document and the alleged risk, (3) concrete circumstances supporting the risk, and (4) a reasonable, objectively explainable likelihood of loss that can be tested against admissible evidence. These criteria are proposed as interpretive parameters to guide adjudication and legislative development, rather than as requirements already expressly stated in the statute. They are intended to promote consistency, uphold the principle of lex certa, and reduce the risk of overcriminalization.
References
REFERENCE
Adji, I. S. (2021). Humanism and the Reform of Law Enforcement. Jakarta: Kompas.
Agustine, O. V. (2021). The Legal Politics of Codifying National Criminal Law from the Perspective of Legal Reform. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, Vol. 10, 87.
Amrani, H. (2021). The Construction of Formal and Material Offenses within the Indonesian Criminal Law System. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 28, No. 3, 512.
Arief, B. N. (2021). An Anthology on Criminal Law Policy: Developments in Drafting the New Criminal Code (KUHP). Jakarta: Kencana.
Arief, M. d. (2022). Theories and Policies of Criminal Law. Bandung: Alumni.
Diantha, I. M. (2021). Normative Legal Research Methodology within the Justification of Legal Theory. Jakarta: Kencana.
Efendi, D. O. (2022). Legal Research. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Fitriyanti, Y. W. (2022). The Protection of Legal Interests as a Basis for the Legitimacy of Criminalization in Criminal Law. Jurnal Jurisprudence, Vol. 12, No. 1, 48.
Flora, H. S. (2020). Restorative Justice as an Alternative for Resolving Criminal Offenses and Its Influence on the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Undiksha, Vol. 7, No. 1, 34.
Hamzah, A. (2020). Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia and Their Development. Jakarta: PT. Softmedia.
Hiariej, E. O. (2021). Principles of Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Huda, C. (2022). From "No Crime Without Fault" to "No Criminal Liability Without Fault." Jakarta: Kencana.
Ibrahim, J. (2020). Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Mamudji, S. S. (2021). Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana.
Muhammad, A. (2020). Law and Legal Research. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Pahlawan, M. R. (2022). The Principle of Legality in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law: A Study of the National Criminal Code. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 19, No. 2, 158.
Prasetyo, T. (2022). Criminal Law. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Raharjo, A. (2020). Cybercrime: Understanding and Preventing Technology-Based Crimes. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Santoso, T. (2022). Overcriminalization and the Limits of Criminalization in the Modern Criminal Law System. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, Vol. 3, No. 1, 14.
Satria, H. (2023). Reformulating Criminal Norms within the Framework of Legal Certainty and Proportionality in Sentencing. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 20, No. 3, 534.
Syahrani, R. (2020). A Summary of the Essentials of Legal Science. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Syawawi, D. F. (2022). The *Lex Certa* Principle and the Problem of Open-Ended Norms in Indonesian Criminal Legislation. *Jurnal Anti Korupsi Integritas*, Vol. 8, No. 1, 72.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiga Abadi, Dhiana Puspitawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







